Discussion about this post

User's avatar
w_codezero2hero's avatar

The Lightfield item is the one I’d keep watching. If agents are going to do meaningful customer-facing work, a CRM can’t remain just rows, fields and workflow triggers, it has to expose enough context to model how the business actually operates. The interesting investment question is whether incumbents can evolve their system-of-record advantage quickly enough, or whether an AI-native context layer becomes a new control point above them.

Marius Laurusevicius's avatar

The juxtaposition in this edition is worth sitting with. Anthropic released an economic scenario model projecting GDP 8.6% above a no-AI baseline by 2030 in its "substantial" scenario — and in the same week, one of their alignment researchers resigned citing existential risk. Five days from now, by September 15, Anthropic and every other GPAI provider above the 10^25 FLOPs training threshold must submit formal systemic risk evaluations to the European AI Office. The economic model and the risk filing go to very different audiences in the same week.

No posts

Ready for more?